green cotton dress Printed green cotton 1920s dress with a sailor collar
SKU: 17009090990
green cotton dress

green cotton dress Printed green cotton 1920s dress with a sailor collar

$26.05 $28.95
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on parroquiadesanalbertomagno.com >
Size: 4
Size Recommendation How To Measure

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

green cotton dress Printed green cotton 1920s dress with a sailor collarWith its sailor dress design and soft cotton fabric, this roaring twenties dress evokes the timeless style of a Great Gatsby day dress while adding a modern, nautical twist. This flapper dress in printed green with a sailor collar combines vintage elegance and nautical charm, making it the perfect 1920s day dress. Whether you're strolling by the shore or heading to a Gatsby inspired gathering, this cotton nautical dress is a must have for any vintage

With its sailor dress design and soft cotton fabric, this roaring twenties dress evokes the timeless style of a Great Gatsby day dress while adding a modern, nautical twist. This flapper dress in printed green with a sailor collar combines vintage elegance and nautical charm, making it the perfect 1920s day dress. Whether you're strolling by the shore or heading to a Gatsby-inspired gathering, this cotton nautical dress is a must-have for any vintage lover.

NB The matching cloche hat can be found here.

NB For more dresses with a nautical look, check out here. 

  • This item is made to order and is not in stock
  • The current production time is stated on the announcement bar on the top of this page.
  • Since the product is yet to be made, there is an opportunity to customize it based on your body measurements and height. Check the Size Chart and if you are not sure which size to choose or need a custom size, please Contact Us before placing your order.

 

DRESS DESIGN

The dress comes with a sailor collar, front tie, and short sleeves. The dress is fully lined with soft and breathable rayon fabric. The design is loose fitting and drop waist. It has no zipper and you can slip it on through the head easily. Thanks to its loose fitting design.

The dress length is a couple of inches below the knee or depending on your height. Check length details below for each size. Please note that because of its drop waist, the dress will look less flattering or less correct if you are a lot shorter or taller than the person’s height recommended for each size. In that case, we recommend ordering a custom size. There are no extra charges for the customization. Contact us for this.

NB: The accessories (necklace, gloves, hats) are not included in the listing.

SIZES

The outfit is available in 4 regular sizes, S, M, L, XL, and custom sizes for up to person's bust of 50 inches. The measurements of bust, waist and hips below are of a person’s BODY, not the dress itself.

For instructions, see Detailed Size Chart

If you are not sure about sizing, kindly contact us with your body measurements and height. We are more than happy to help you choose the right size.

*The model  wears a custom dress based on her body measurements and height.

CUSTOMIZATION

Make sure you know your 'exact' body measurements, which have been measured correctly as instructed above. If you are between sizes send us your measurements and height. We will help consider whether you need a custom size. Most of the time we encourage you have your dress customized to your body measurements and height so that it fits well and is body flattering. And you will look great and feel confident in it. We offer custom orders of up to person's bust of 50”. There are no extra fees for size customization. However, a custom item cannot be returned for refund or exchange. Please contact us first if you would like a custom item before placing your order.

CARE

Hand wash or machine wash in cool water (30C). Hang to dry inside out and iron with medium heat.

 

CONTACT US IN CASE OF QUESTIONS

We are based in Thailand. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions about this dress or anything in our shop.

Happy shopping.
- Thongbai, on behalf of the La Vie Delight Team.

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 17009090990

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell green cotton dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 335 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Chris Slayton
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent book on the historicity of the resurrection!
Format: Paperback
There are many books devoted to the resurrection of Jesus. Licona’s book is unique in that it takes “a new historiographical approach” to the resurrection by applying the principles of secular historical analysis to the question of whether Jesus rose from the dead. In applying the historical method, Licona seeks to understand the objective truth about what happened regardless of his subjective Christian beliefs on the matter. In fact, Licona readily admits his personal bias – or “horizon” – and his desire to see the historicity of the resurrection confirmed. However, as he points out, all historians have a “horizon” of some sort, and in his research and analysis, Licona is careful – some would say too careful perhaps – to set aside his “horizon” in order to objectively consider the evidence. Licona considers a variety of historical sources pertaining to the resurrection, both biblical and extra-biblical, weighing each source on a spectrum of historicity – from “certainly not historical” to “certainly historical.” Licona seeks to find the best explanation for the evidence according to five criteria: plausibility, explanatory scope, explanatory power, less ad hoc, and illumination. After examining the evidence, Licona concludes that there are three virtually undisputed facts that he calls “historical bedrock:” (1) Jesus died by crucifixion; (2) Jesus’ disciples had experiences that led them to believe that he had been resurrected; and (3) Paul converted after experiencing what he interpreted as a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus. Licona then weighs five naturalistic hypotheses for the resurrection, demonstrating how each of these views falls short of providing the best explanation for the historical bedrock. Licona ultimately concludes that the resurrection is the only hypothesis that meets all five criteria. In other words, Jesus’ resurrection from the dead provides the best explanation of the historical bedrock, and the historian is warranted in regarding Jesus’ resurrection as an actual historical event. Licona’s historiographical approach to the resurrection produces a very strong case for the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. I particularly appreciated Licona’s treatment of “horizon.” Licona is transparent about his Christian beliefs, but he demonstrates a willingness to go where the evidence leads and bent over backwards to remain objective. For example, Licona does not include the empty tomb as part of the historical bedrock since many scholars dispute the empty tomb. Some would take exception to this, but I believe it actually strengthens the case for the resurrection and leaves the skeptic with very little to argue. In other words, Licona is able to make a convincing case for the resurrection without considering what many Christians consider the best evidence – the empty tomb! I found the book very helpful, but keep in mind it is an academic work, and at over 600 pages, it is not necessarily an easy read. That being said, Licona’s book is outstanding and is a “must-read” for anyone seeking to understand the historical evidence for the resurrection or seeking to counter skeptical arguments against it. This is a great book to add to your library.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2021
J
Verified Purchase
Jamie N.Campbell
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
A fresh historical perspective to the Resurrection! -by Jamie D.
Format: Paperback
Although there have been countless books written about the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from a theological perspective, few have successfully tackled the Resurrection from the historical perspective. Dr. Licona has successfully done just that, applying a historical methodology to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. In his opening chapter, Dr. Licona begins by defining what is meant by history, the methods that one employs to study history as well as the limitations that comes when one studies history. It is here that he introduces useful terms to the readers that are re-introduce in subsequent chapter. Horizon, a synonym for bias, can play a critical role in how one perceives and presents history to others. To reduce horizon, Dr. Licona believes that there are six main principles that can help an historian maintain a more objective perspective when reporting history. One of these main principles is that of “historical bedrock” a consensus of what is majorly accepted and infrequently debated. Not only is a consensus important when one considers a hypothesis but a hypothesis that has a solid explanation is important as well. For a hypothesis to have the weight of believability, it must stand up to five different criteria as well. In chapter 2, Dr. Licona then turns his attention to the subject of miracles and their role in history and successfully debunks the most common presuppositions cited by the world’s most famous skeptics against the historicity of miracles. It is in chapter 3 that Dr. Licona employs the historical method to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by examining both biblical and extrabiblical writings spanning within 200 years of the event. Upon the review of these various writings, he assigns a rating from “unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probably, indeterminate and not useful” to determine if they contain any historical weight in its regard to the independent testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The historical bedrock principle is re-introduced into chapter 4 and is applied not only to the death of Jesus Christ but to His life as well. Dr. Licona notes that there many aspects of the Jesus’ life and death that are considered historical bedrock even among those with varied agendas. Dr. Licona concludes his book by examining some of the leading naturalistic hypotheses touted from the most prominent liberal and skeptics in this field. By employing the five criteria that gives the historian the most successful explanation, Licona concludes that it is not the naturalistic hypothesis which fits regarding the Resurrection, but the supernatural one. The supernatural hypothesis of the Resurrection is the most solid explanation since it fulfills both historical bedrock as well as meeting all five criteria for the best explanation and thus should be considered by any credible historian as a well attested event that occurred in the past. In summary, I highly recommend this book. As a believer of 40+ years, I learned things about my faith that I did not know about before. For example, I learned how the kerygma, an early Christian creed, lends historical weight to the Resurrection. My advice for believers is not to be intimidated by the voluminous size of this book. It was certainly well worth the read. Dr. Licona has done an excellent job in presenting the material through the perspective of a historian, so much so that one may temporarily forget that he is a theologian as well! Despite the myriad of footnotes peppered through the pages, the book was very easy to read and digest. In short, a must read for those who want to have a better understanding in how to engage skeptics from a different perspective when discussing the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Get it! You’ll feel that much smarter and grounded in the faith once you’ve read the last page!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2021
J
Verified Purchase
John Keller
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Don’t be intimidated...it's detailed, but systematic and rational
Format: Paperback
Don’t be intimidated by this 700-page tome. Once you factor in the bibliography, index and footnotes, the body of the work is only about 400 pages. Licona includes an all-important, detailed outline for quick reference back to key topics, and it’s valuable because of the variety of issues he tackles. I’d say, he does a wonderful job of giving us an objective, systematic approach to addressing the historicity of the events following Jesus’ crucifixion. Licona lays the groundwork for his examination of the issue by considering the philosophy of history and tackling things like what is truth, what makes something a historical fact, who has the burden of proof, and is history a science? As a needed addition to this philosophical introduction, he spends time outlining the methods he will use to approaching relevant texts, claims of miracles, and consensus facts. Most important, I think, to his methods was his self-examination of potential bias due to personal belief and worldview. He addresses what he calls a personal “horizon” that historians must be set aside in order to be objective and get at the truth. He certainly points it out in others along the way and makes it clear throughout the book that he is trying to identify and eliminate any potential bias he may bring to the process. In his investigation, he addresses the most important sources related to Jesus’ life, crucifixion and claims of the resurrection. He deals with both Christian and non-Christian sources that were written immediately following the events as well as within the following 200 years. Licona makes the case for authenticity and credibility of the most important sources, and where there have been challenges to these sources over the centuries, he addresses those challenges head on. Ultimately, he boils the events, claims, facts and sources down to what he calls the “bedrock” pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This bedrock consists of three facts that are well supported by authentic, textual evidence which enjoy nearly consensus support by all historians (both Christian and non-Christian). For Licona, the bedrock which need be answered are (1) Jesus’ death by crucifixion, (2) the claims Jesus appeared to individuals and groups following his burial, and (3) the conversion of the Church persecutor, Paul. Ultimately, Licona breaks down six different hypotheses which claim to explain the bedrock and he uses systematic criteria for weighing those hypotheses. He concludes that a resurrection is the best explanation but admits that it’s only by setting aside a naturalistic worldview that one can embrace the conclusion. I like Licona’s methodical approach but would offer two critiques. Do we really need all the Greek citations written out? I understand that there is nuance and variations in meaning for words that are used in the original sources, but to give us all the text and the translation seemed superfluous. Second, I think it was a cop-out to skim the importance of the empty tomb. Other historians put the fact of the empty tomb as one of their top facts to be explained, but Licona punted on it because he didn’t feel it received universal consensus. Consensus aside, the fact of the empty tomb does receive support by a strong majority of scholars, even ones that do not support the resurrection. This cross-section of scholarly support, along with the volume and type of textural evidence, namely the confirmation by Christian enemies, should have elevated the fact of the empty tomb to the “bedrock” which require explanation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2021
E
Verified Purchase
Elly
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
so helpful
Format: Paperback
got for school and used it a lot its been so helpful
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
E
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Great price...
Format: Paperback
Needed this for my EKG course. Price was right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026

recommand products

Deanna Lemon Asymmetric Long-Sleeve Ruched Maxi Dress – Club L London
21.82
Emerson Midi Dress
25.99
Oh Polly Sloane split plunge neck Maxi Dress in Lemon sherbet-Yellow
20.37
Glinda Dress The Good Witch Glinda Costume Cosplay inspired Wicked Wiz – Mermaidcosplay
25.62
Vintage Lemon Print 1950s Swing Dress
25.18